[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110524061525.GA29815@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 08:15:25 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] more x86/apic changes for v2.6.40
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> Possibly the resume fix in the APIC merge :-/
>
> It's these commits:
>
> 31dce14a3269: x86, ioapic: Use ioapic_saved_data while enabling intr-remapping
> 4c79185cdb14: x86, ioapic: Allocate ioapic_saved_data early
> b64ce24daffb: x86, ioapic: Fix potential resume deadlock
>
> The first one fixes the resume bug in an easily backportable way (although
> the GFP_ATOMIC is not nice), the later two do it cleaner.
>
> So if b64ce24daffb works for you and 31dce14a3269 breaks this would signal
> that the fix from Suresh is the source of the Atom regression.
In particular the lapic_resume() bit looks suspect. Does save_ioapic_entries()
get called? It's called in enable_IR_x2apic() but your Atom is probably not
x2apic. Non-x2apic system do not get save_ioapic_entries() called, so there's
nothing to restore at resume time AFAICS ... Suresh?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists