| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20110524125147.0eb112b5@absol.kitzblitz> Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 12:51:47 +0200 From: Nicolas Kaiser <nikai@...ai.net> To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> Cc: Richard Cochran <richard.cochran@...cron.at>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH] posix clocks: correct error value in posix_clock_poll() Signed-off-by: Nicolas Kaiser <nikai@...ai.net> --- It looks to me like -ENODEV might not be a good return value in poll(). Would POLLERR be the correct one in this case? kernel/time/posix-clock.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/time/posix-clock.c b/kernel/time/posix-clock.c index c340ca6..2424d3f 100644 --- a/kernel/time/posix-clock.c +++ b/kernel/time/posix-clock.c @@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ static unsigned int posix_clock_poll(struct file *fp, poll_table *wait) int result = 0; if (!clk) - return -ENODEV; + return POLLERR; if (clk->ops.poll) result = clk->ops.poll(clk, fp, wait); -- 1.7.5.rc3 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists