[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1306234696.7218.14.camel@i7.infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 11:58:15 +0100
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pci, dmar: Update dmar units devices list during hotplug
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 16:15 -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> I think I'd vote for saving some kind of representation of the bus
> hierarchy, we probably don't need to list every possible individual
> device. Leaving a broken pointer around to be matched up and restored
> later just seems like a continuation of an idea that was bad to begin
> with. Thanks,
I agree. We should just process the original ATSR information in
dmar_find_matched_drhd_unit(), rather than comparing with a list of
possibly stale pointers.
I don't quite understand why the list of PCI devices was *ever* done
like that.
--
David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse@...el.com Intel Corporation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists