lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1306244383.1465.59.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date:	Tue, 24 May 2011 09:39:43 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
	Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: fix need_resched() when checking peempt

On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 21:27 +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
> When checking if current task could be preempted by a newly woken task,
> further check could be bypassed if the current thread is different from
> the current task of run-queue, and it is corrected accordingly.

Ug, that change log is an obfuscated mess. But looking at the actual
patch, I figured what you wanted to say. How about this:

----
The RT preempt check tests the wrong task if NEED_RESCHED is set. It
currently checks the local CPU task. It is suppose to check the task
that is running on the run queue we are about to wake another task on.
----


> 
> Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>

With a new change log:

Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>

-- Steve

> ---
> 
> --- tip-git/kernel/sched_rt.c	Sun May 22 20:12:01 2011
> +++ sched_rt.c	Tue May 24 20:31:27 2011
> @@ -1074,7 +1074,7 @@ static void check_preempt_curr_rt(struct
>  	 * to move current somewhere else, making room for our non-migratable
>  	 * task.
>  	 */
> -	if (p->prio == rq->curr->prio && !need_resched())
> +	if (p->prio == rq->curr->prio && !test_tsk_need_resched(rq->curr))
>  		check_preempt_equal_prio(rq, p);
>  #endif
>  }


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ