[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110524144839.GC30117@linux-mips.org>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 15:48:39 +0100
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
To: "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Subject: Re: (Short?) merge window reminder
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 07:17:21PM -0400, Ted Ts'o wrote:
> > So I'm toying with 3.0 (and in that case, it really would be "3.0",
> > not "3.0.0" - the stable team would get the third digit rather than
> > the fourth one.
>
> If we change from 2.6.X to 3.X, then if we don't change anything else,
> then successive stable release will cause the LINUX_VERSION_CODE to be
> incremented. This isn't necessary bad, but it would be a different
> from what we have now.
It will require another bunch of changes to scripts that try to make sense
out of kernel Linux version numbers. It's a minor issue and we might be
better off doing something else than version number magic. Not last a
new major version number raises expectations - whatever those might be.
Ralf
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists