linux-kernel - Re: perf: regression with PERF_EVENT_IOC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 24 May 2011 17:11:54 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	Vince Weaver <vweaver1@...s.utk.edu>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, fbuihuu@...il.com, mingo@...e.hu,
	paulus@...ba.org, acme@...hat.com
Subject: Re: perf: regression with PERF_EVENT_IOC_REFRESH

On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 11:04 -0400, Vince Weaver wrote:
> As an aside, I also wasted 6 hours last night finding out that you don't 
> get signaled on overflow if you don't have a ring-buffer mmap()ed, even
> if you never read from the buffer and you only are interested in counting
> the number of overflows. 

That sounds like something we could fix, let me investigate.

>  I should stop complaining though or you'll
> start telling me to fix the documentation.  Which maybe I would do if I 
> didn't spend all my time writing code to reproduce problems in the perf 
> ABI for bisection purposes. 

Both are appreciated.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/