linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/7] um: print info about fatal segfaults

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201105242214.21102.richard@nod.at>
Date:	Tue, 24 May 2011 22:14:20 +0200
From:	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] um: print info about fatal segfaults

Am Dienstag 24 Mai 2011, 21:34:33 schrieb Andrew Morton:
> Please see the nice comment in printk.h
> 
> /*
>  * Please don't use printk_ratelimit(), because it shares ratelimiting
> state * with all other unrelated printk_ratelimit() callsites.  Instead
> use * printk_ratelimited() or plain old __ratelimit().
>  */
> 
> I thought we had a checkpatch rule for this but apparently I dreamed
> it.

Hmm, it seems I'm not the only one who doesn't know that. :-\
rw@...coon:/media/data1/linux-2.6 (master)> grep * -R -e "printk_ratelimit()" | wc -l
243

Anyway, will resend...

Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/