linux-kernel - Re: [BUG] "sched: Remove rq->lock from the first half of ttwu()" locks up on ARM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 24 May 2011 23:32:30 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@....com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...sony.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [BUG]  "sched: Remove rq->lock from the first half of ttwu()" 
 locks up on ARM

On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 19:13 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Peter,
> 
> I've experienced all kind of lock-ups on ARM SMP platforms recently, and
> finally tracked it down to the following patch:
> 
> e4a52bcb9a18142d79e231b6733cabdbf2e67c1f [sched: Remove rq->lock from the first half of ttwu()].
> 
> Even on moderate load, the machine locks up, often silently, and
> sometimes with a few messages like:
> INFO: rcu_preempt_state detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: { 0} (detected by 1, t=12002 jiffies)
> 
> Another side effect of this patch is that the load average is always 0,
> whatever load I throw at the system.
> 
> Reverting the sched changes up to that patch (included) gives me a
> working system again, which happily survives parallel kernel
> compilations without complaining.
> 
> My knowledge of the scheduler being rather limited, I haven't been able
> to pinpoint the exact problem (though it probably have something to do
> with __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW being defined on ARM). The enclosed
> patch somehow papers over the load average problem, but the system ends
> up locking up anyway:

Hurm.. I'll try and make x86 use __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW, IIRC
Ingo once said that that is possible and try to see if I can reproduce.
No clear ideas atm.

Thanks for reporting.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/