[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110524213735.GM27634@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 23:37:35 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Vince Weaver <vweaver1@...s.utk.edu>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, paulus@...ba.org, acme@...hat.com
Subject: Re: perf: regression -- missing /sys/devices/system/cpu/perf_events
* Vince Weaver <vweaver1@...s.utk.edu> wrote:
> On Tue, 24 May 2011, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > So, what is wrong with the method Peter suggested: the presence of the perf
> > syscall (it not returning -ENOSYS) is bona fide evidence that perf is
> > available.
>
> it's just hard to do that from a shell script.
Yeah.
> also, running the perf syscall can be tricky if you have a new kernel but an
> older set of header files that doesn't have the syscall number defined.
I suspect you could add some quick band-aid like:
#ifndef __NR_perf_event_open
# ifdef __i386__
# define __NR_perf_event_open 336
# endif
# ifdef __x86_64__
# define __NR_perf_event_open 298
# endif
# ifdef __powerpc__
# define __NR_perf_event_open 319
# endif
# ifdef __arm__
# define __NR_perf_event_open 364
# endif
#endif
#ifndef __NR_perf_event_open
# error Please add the __NR_perf_event_open definition for this architecture!
#endif
This should cover 99% of the users - and fill in the table as people report
build failures :)
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists