[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=zVAMzbx7tXP2tOfBGE_hcMFzxOg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 17:49:08 -0400
From: Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@...il.com>
To: Hiromu Yakura <hiromu1996@...il.com>
Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, zippel@...ux-m68k.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Kconfig: add warning about permission of config file
Hi,
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Hiromu Yakura <hiromu1996@...il.com> wrote:
> [...]
> conf_write() is called after the configure changed.
> So I don't think we should handle the failed case of conf_write()
> because the purpose of this patch is not to losing changes.
>
Then your patch is incomplete. only open(2) and write(2) can fail in
more than 30 different ways, you check 1.
- Arnaud
ps: I am not even addressing the race-condition introduced by your patch...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists