[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <00eb01cc19d0$e526a9b0$af73fd10$@org>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 08:10:23 +0300
From: "Tanya Brokhman" <tlinder@...eaurora.org>
To: "'Sebastian Andrzej Siewior'" <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
"'Mike Frysinger'" <vapier@...too.org>
Cc: <greg@...ah.com>, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <balbi@...com>,
<ablay@...eaurora.org>,
"'open list'" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v12 4/8] usb:gadget: Add SuperSpeed support to the Gadget Framework
Hi Sebastian,
> >+ case USB_REQ_GET_STATUS:
> >+ if (!gadget_is_superspeed(gadget))
> >+ goto unknown;
> >+ if (ctrl->bRequestType != (USB_DIR_IN |
> USB_RECIP_INTERFACE))
> >+ goto unknown;
> >+ value = 2; /* This is the length of the get_status
reply
> */
> >+ *((__le16 *)req->buf) = 0;
>
> Mike please correct me if I'm wrong bug this looks like a case for
> put_unaligned_le16().
> Is someone actually using gadget support on blackfin? I'm asking
> because
> config_buf() (same file, upstream) is using req->buf to build the
> descriptors in place and one element is le16 which should be affected.
>
Mike answered that you're right in your observation. I'm not familiar with
blackfin. Could you please elaborate on this? I understand that I need to
use put_unaligned_le16(), will do, but I would like to better understand why
and if there is a way to test this so that blackfin won't be broken.
Best regards,
Tanya Brokhman
Consultant for Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists