[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110524052342.GA24918@rainbow>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 09:23:42 +0400
From: Dmitry Artamonow <mad_soft@...ox.ru>
To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Harald Welte <laforge@...fiish.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] gpio: add GPIOF_ values regardless on kconfig
settings
On 21:58 Mon 23 May , Randy Dunlap wrote:
> From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
>
> Make GPIOF_ defined values available even when GPIOLIB nor GENERIC_GPIO
> is enabled by moving them to <linux/gpio.h>.
>
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Looks good.
We probably may also want to move definition of struct gpio into
include/linux/gpio.h to make things like this work as well:
static struct gpio some_gpios[] = {
{ GPIO_BLAH, GPIOF_IN, "BLAH"},
{ GPIO_BLAH2, GPIOF_OUT_INIT_LOW, "BLAH2"},
};
static int some_init_function(void)
{
/* ... */
gpio_request_array(some_gpios, ARRAY_SIZE(some_gpios));
/* ... */
}
These gpio_request_one() and gpio_request_array() are quite handy, so I
suppose more and more drivers will use it as we go...
--
Best regards,
Dmitry "MAD" Artamonow
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists