[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1306311593.30236.103.camel@vkoul-udesk3>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 13:49:53 +0530
From: "Koul, Vinod" <vinod.koul@...el.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@....fi>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
hsweeten@...ionengravers.com, ryan@...ewatersys.com,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] dmaengine: add ep93xx DMA support
On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 10:39 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> 2011/5/22 Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@....fi>:
>
> > The ep93xx DMA controller has 10 independent memory to peripheral (M2P)
> > channels, and 2 dedicated memory to memory (M2M) channels. M2M channels can
> > also be used by SPI and IDE to perform DMA transfers to/from their memory
> > mapped FIFOs.
>
> No so much a review comment as an observation: I opposed the merge of the
> EP93xx SPI driver in drivers/spi/ep93xx_spi.c on the grounds that it was close
> enough to amba-pl022.c that it could use that driver instead.
>
> One of the arguments against was that you were going to do custom DMA
> and stuff. Now you're using the DMAengine, so can you please reconsider
> refactoring amba-pl022.c to suit your needs and you'll get DMA support for
> free mor or less.
Linus is the dma IP same as existing ones?
In that case we shouldn't have a new driver for same IP.
--
~Vinod
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists