[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110525092124.GI14556@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 12:21:26 +0300
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
To: Tanya Brokhman <tlinder@...eaurora.org>
Cc: 'Alan Stern' <stern@...land.harvard.edu>, balbi@...com,
'Sarah Sharp' <sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com>, greg@...ah.com,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
ablay@...eaurora.org, 'open list' <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 7/8] usb: Adding SuperSpeed support to dummy_hcd
Hi,
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 07:46:38AM +0300, Tanya Brokhman wrote:
> > Which leaves a question about the composite gadget framework. Should
> > it be updated with SS support? Probably not until the various function
> > drivers have all been updated.
>
> As I mentioned, updating all of the gadget drivers will take a long time and
> I don't fill confident enough doing since I'm not familiar with all of them
> and don't have the ability to test each of them properly. I can add SS
> descriptors to f_mass_storage, g_zero if it helps and of course f_uasp
> already has them.
> I'm a bit confused by this actually... We've been discussing this patch
> series for quite a while now and I got the impression that except for some
> minor comments you were all for excepting this. Was I wrong or am I
> misunderstanding the above?
> In any case, I don't feel that adding SS support for the Gadget framework
> should be delayed until all gadget drivers add SS descriptors because this
> patch series will give the developers the ability to test these gadget
> drivers at SS. Also, several developers addressed me offline with questions
> on this series so I know people are using it in their work. And of course we
> do :)
just remove the hunk which changes composite.c speed field and it should
all be ok :-)
--
balbi
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (491 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists