lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110525092743.GK14556@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com>
Date:	Wed, 25 May 2011 12:27:45 +0300
From:	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
To:	Tanya Brokhman <tlinder@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	balbi@...com, 'Alan Stern' <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
	'Sarah Sharp' <sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com>, greg@...ah.com,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	ablay@...eaurora.org, 'open list' <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 7/8] usb: Adding SuperSpeed support to dummy_hcd

On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:26:08PM +0300, Tanya Brokhman wrote:
> > > As I mentioned, updating all of the gadget drivers will take a long
> > > time and I don't fill confident enough doing since I'm not familiar
> > > with all of them and don't have the ability to test each of them
> > > properly. I can add SS descriptors to f_mass_storage, g_zero if it
> > > helps and of course f_uasp already has them.
> > > I'm a bit confused by this actually... We've been discussing this
> > > patch series for quite a while now and I got the impression that
> > > except for some minor comments you were all for excepting this. Was I
> > > wrong or am I misunderstanding the above?
> > > In any case, I don't feel that adding SS support for the Gadget
> > > framework should be delayed until all gadget drivers add SS
> > > descriptors because this patch series will give the developers the
> > > ability to test these gadget drivers at SS. Also, several developers
> > > addressed me offline with questions on this series so I know people
> > > are using it in their work. And of course we do :)
> > 
> > just remove the hunk which changes composite.c speed field and it
> > should all be ok :-)
> > 
> 
> But that's why we added the feature flag. Isn't leaving it FALSE the same as
> removing the part that updates gadget speed? It is protected with #ifdef.

you mean the module parameter ? This will mean that users will have to
remember another module parameter otherwise it will not work in some
situations :-)

the module should work without that parameter :-)

-- 
balbi

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (491 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ