[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201105251409.47309.alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 14:09:46 +0200
From: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@...tec-electronic.com>
To: Tomoya <tomoya-linux@....okisemi.com>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, qi.wang@...el.com,
yong.y.wang@...el.com, joel.clark@...el.com,
kok.howg.ewe@...el.com, toshiharu-linux@....okisemi.com
Subject: Re: pch_gpio: Support new device ML7223
Hello Tomoya,
On Monday 09 May 2011 12:58:49 Tomoya wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/pch_gpio.c b/drivers/gpio/pch_gpio.c
> index f970a5f..36919e7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/pch_gpio.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/pch_gpio.c
> @@ -283,8 +283,10 @@ static int pch_gpio_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> #define pch_gpio_resume NULL
> #endif
>
> +#define PCI_VENDOR_ID_ROHM 0x10DB
Should this be moved to pci_ids.h?
> static DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE(pch_gpio_pcidev_id) = {
> { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x8803) },
> + { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_ROHM, 0x8014) },
Likewise for the product ID. While at it, the ID for EG20T could also be moved
in a separate patch.
> { 0, }
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, pch_gpio_pcidev_id);
Regards,
Alexander
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists