[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=O5vG=pgaYsE-6GXODwF910Q2qwA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 07:34:27 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: oleg@...hat.com, vda.linux@...glemail.com,
jan.kratochvil@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, indan@....nu, bdonlan@...il.com,
pedro@...esourcery.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/19] ptrace: use bit_waitqueue for TRAPPING instead of wait_chldexit
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 1:44 AM, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Sure, but can you at least explain why you dislike it so much? This
> is the only place bit position is needed and having two variants with
> _BIT can be confusing (I did that more than once with workqueue code).
> ilog2() could be, I don't know, unfamiliar, but what's so crappy about
> it?
Have you looked at ilog2()?
Do you realize how much extra crap it is for the compiler? For
absolutely *no* reason.
I hate that disgusting thing. It basically screams to everybody "I'm a
f*cking moron, I did things the wrong way around, so now I use this
thing to undo my braindamage".
You can get a good idea of the code quality if you grep for users. I
don't think it's an accident at all that the two big blocks are
ide-tape and some infiniband drivers.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists