[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BANLkTimYs4rkgP+hmnG3atLhhCz+jQF=Dg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 13:01:39 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Kees Cook <kees.cook@...onical.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] v2 seccomp_filters: Enable ftrace-based system call filtering
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Kees Cook <kees.cook@...onical.com> wrote:
>
> Uhm, what? Chrome would use it. And LXC would. Those were stated very
> early on as projects extremely interested in syscall filtering.
.. and I seriously doubt it is workable.
Or at least it needs some actual working proof-of-concept thing.
Exactly because of issues like direct rendering etc, that require some
of the nastier system calls to work at all.
As to your example of apache modules - last I saw, most of those were
written in high-level scripting languages that almost invariably end
up using quite a bit of the system call interfaces. And more
importantly, almost nobody does unportable code.
So hey, I'm willing to be convinced. But I'll need more than people
_saying_ that they'd be interested. Because judging by past
performance, nobody ever uses esoteric cool new features.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists