[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1105251622040.8972@ubuntu-natty>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 16:22:50 -0400 (EDT)
From: Parag Warudkar <parag.lkml@...il.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>
cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Parag Warudkar <parag.lkml@...il.com>,
Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux SCSI List <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SCSI IOCTL: Check for device deletion [was Re:
__elv_add_request OOPS]
On Wed, 25 May 2011, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 13:03 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Parag Warudkar <parag.lkml@...il.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > +static inline int sdev_early_check(struct scsi_device *sdev)
> > > +{
> > > + if (!sdev || sdev->sdev_state == SDEV_DEL
> > > + || sdev->sdev_state > SDEV_QUIESCE)
> > > + return -ENXIO;
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> >
> > Can somebody explain why it's those states, and nothing else?
>
> The states are definitely wrong. QUIESCE shouldn't cause an error.
>
QUIESCE is not causing an error above - > QUIESCE is which per the
documentation is correct.
Parag
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists