| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 23:40:36 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> To: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com> cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86, intel: Output microcode revision v2 Andi, On Wed, 25 May 2011, Andi Kleen wrote: > > You ignored the majority of the review suggestions i gave you in the > > previous thread, and you know that i won't apply your patches without > > you addressing all feedback. > > Huh? I addressed all suggestions that I didn't explicitely > reject (which were few) > > At least to my knowledge. If I missed something that I didn't > reject please point it out. Ingo has politely asked you to change the patches and he gave very detailed advise. Now he pointed out that you ignored most of it. So instead of sitting down and rereading the thread you want Ingo to do your homework and repeat what he already told you ? You seem to believe that requests from maintainers are just random noise, which you can decide to reject or ignore depending on your personal preference. There is no such concept neither for you nor for anybody else. Thanks, tglx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists