[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110525214737.GA8955@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 23:47:37 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>,
Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/9] mce recovery for Sandy Bridge server
* Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com> wrote:
> 2011/5/25 Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>:
>
> > Btw., the SIGKILL logic is probably overcomplicated: when it's
> > clear that user-space can not recover why not do a do_exit() and
> > be done with it? As long as it's called from a syscall level
> > codepath and no locks/resources are held do_exit() can be called.
>
> There is no SIGKILL [...]
there is one here:
mm/memory-failure.c::kill_procs_ao()
force_sig(SIGKILL, tk->tsk);
Which can be reached from memory_failure() in certain (justified)
circumstances.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists