[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1105252359460.3078@ionos>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 00:01:19 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc: Youquan Song <youquan.song@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, david.woodhouse@...el.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hpa@...or.com, hpa@...ux.intel.com,
allen.m.kay@...el.com, suresh.b.siddha@...el.com,
rajesh.sankaran@...el.com, asit.k.mallick@...el.com,
kent.liu@...el.com, Youquan Song <youquan.song@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] x86, vt-d: enable x2apic opt out
On Wed, 25 May 2011, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Youquan Song <youquan.song@...el.com> wrote:
>
> > New version of VT-d2 specification
> > (http://download.intel.com/technology
> > /computing/vptech/Intel(r)_VT_for_Direct_IO.pdf) includes a new
> > feature that provide firmware a way to request system software to
> > opt out of enable x2APIC mode. DMAR ACPI table newly define flags.1
> > bit: x2APIC_OPT_OUT which is set to request System software opt out
> > xAPIC mode if flags.0 bit:INTR_REMAP is also set.
>
> So why isnt the x2apic disabled in the CPUID? That's the canonical
> way to unsupport a particular non-working CPU hw feature.
Because some committee decided to make it an ACPI feature. That's
broken by design, but you can't change the stupid spec retroactively.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists