[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4DDD7D9E.60100@kasperkp.dk>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 00:07:26 +0200
From: Kasper Pedersen <kkp2010@...perkp.dk>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] x86: tsc: make TSC calibration immune to interrupts
On 05/25/2011 12:51 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> The 8 additional samples costs us 28 microseconds in startup
>> time.
>
> That's a good reason to avoid the whole conditional thing and just do
> the best of 5 always.
I do not mind removing it again.
The additional 170us only happen when quick_pit_calibrate fails,
and then native_calibrate_tsc burns 30ms extra anyway.
>> +
>> + *p = tp;
>
> The value is completely uninteresting when we return ULLONG_MAX.
>
native_calibrate_tsc() depends on *p being written regardless of
whether we can get a SMI-free reading:
/* We don't have an alternative source, disable TSC */
if (!hpet && !ref1 && !ref2) {
printk("TSC: No reference (HPET/PMTIMER) available\n");
return 0;
}
this works since acpi_pm_read_early() returns 0 when pmtmr_ioport
is 0, or CONFIG_X86_PM_TIMER is not set.
Without it we would report "calibration failed" rather than
"No reference" or "Using PIT" when there is neither pmtimer nor
hpet.
/Kasper Pedersen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists