[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8739k3k1fb.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 11:05:04 +0930
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Carsten Otte <cotte@...ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
linux390@...ibm.com, Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Shirley Ma <xma@...ibm.com>, lguest@...ts.ozlabs.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Krishna Kumar <krkumar2@...ibm.com>,
Tom Lendacky <tahm@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, steved@...ibm.com,
habanero@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 10/14] virtio_net: limit xmit polling
On Mon, 23 May 2011 14:19:00 +0300, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com> wrote:
> I do understand how it seems a waste to leave direct space
> in the ring while we might in practice have space
> due to indirect. Didn't come up with a nice way to
> solve this yet - but 'no worse than now :)'
Let's just make it "bool free_old_xmit_skbs(unsigned int max)". max ==
2 for the normal xmit path, so we're low latency but we keep ahead on
average. max == -1 for the "we're out of capacity, we may have to stop
the queue".
That keeps it simple and probably the right thing...
Thanks,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists