[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BANLkTind9dUu3=OkSjXrkmrh5ik6xxT=vw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 11:57:51 +0300
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kees Cook <kees.cook@...onical.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gnatapov@...hat.com,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] v2 seccomp_filters: Enable ftrace-based system call filtering
Hi Avi,
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com> wrote:
> You mean each thread will have a different security context? I don't see
> the point. All threads share all of memory so it would be trivial for one
> thread to exploit another and gain all of its privileges.
So how would that happen? I'm assuming that once the security context
has been set up for a thread, you're not able to change it after that.
You'd be able to exploit other threads through shared memory but how
would you gain privileges?
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists