[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1306426823.27474.241.camel@e102391-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 17:20:23 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@....com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...sony.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] "sched: Remove rq->lock from the first half of ttwu()"
locks up on ARM
On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 18:09 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 17:59 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 17:45 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > > Stupid question. Can't we fix this problem if we do
> > >
> > > - if (p == current)
> > > + if (cpu == raw_smp_processor_id())
> > >
> > > ?
> > >
> > > I forgot the rules... but iirc task_cpu(p) can't be changed under us?
> >
> > Easy enough to test.. brain gave out again,. hold on ;-)
>
> The below seems to run all-right so far, I'll let it run for a while.
Doesn't look very good here. The serial console basically locks up as
soon as the system gets busy, even if the kernel compilation seem to
progress at a decent pace.
M.
--
Reality is an implementation detail.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists