[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <493994B35A117E4F832F97C4719C4C04011E2157D6@orsmsx505.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 19:08:27 -0700
From: "Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
To: Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
CC: "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
"jbeulich@...ell.com" <jbeulich@...ell.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/3] coretemp: Get microcode revision from cpu_data v2
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jean Delvare [mailto:khali@...ux-fr.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2011 1:54 PM
> To: Andi Kleen
> Cc: x86@...nel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Andi Kleen;
> jbeulich@...ell.com; Yu, Fenghua
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] coretemp: Get microcode revision from cpu_data
> v2
>
> Hi Andi,
>
> On Wed, 25 May 2011 12:32:28 -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
> >
> > Now that the ucode revision is available in cpu_data remove
> > the existing code in coretemp.c to query it manually. Read the ucode
> > revision from cpu_data instead
>
> Where is this available? Not upstream yet, apparently. I get a build
> failure here.
>
This is one of three patches. Cpu_data is defined in the first patch. You need to get the other two to test them.
But I think Andi will send out a newer version with some changes. So we can test the newer patch set then.
Thanks.
-Fenghua
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists