linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for May 26 (drivers/net/caif)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20110526120702.fac24de0.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date:	Thu, 26 May 2011 12:07:02 -0700
From:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Sjur Braendeland <sjur.brandeland@...ricsson.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for May 26 (drivers/net/caif)

On Thu, 26 May 2011 16:39:41 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> [The kernel.org mirroring is being slow today]


(not new)

drivers/net/caif/caif_serial.c:194: warning: 'return' with no value, in function returning non-void
drivers/net/caif/caif_serial.c:202: warning: 'return' with no value, in function returning non-void


I'm curious:  how do warnings like this get overlooked?
too much noise in the build messages?  or it wasn't overlooked, just ignored?


---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/