[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1306444117.5180.62.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 14:08:37 -0700
From: Shirley Ma <mashirle@...ibm.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, mst@...hat.com,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 2/4 net-next] skbuff: Add userspace zero-copy
buffers in skb
On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 22:55 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le jeudi 26 mai 2011 à 13:24 -0700, Shirley Ma a écrit :
>
> > I could reduce callback pointer by moving it to *arg, but not desc,
> this
> > indicates that which buffer DMA hasn't done yet in *arg.
>
>
> I guess you dont need to use skb itself to hold all your states ?
>
> I understand its convenient for you, but I believe its worth the pain
> to
> use only one pointer to a (small) object where you put all your stuff.
>
> Some machines alloc/free millions of skbs per second.
>
> If/when most skb uses are for userspace zero-copy buffers we can
> embbed
> your small object in skb itself ;)
You are right, w/o this desc, there will be lots of alloc/dealloc in the
caller side. To have better performance, maybe I should have changed
most skbs to use zero-copy buffers. :)
Ok, for now let me try to move it to caller, just leave one pointer
*uarg here.
Thanks
Shirley
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists