[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110526043344.GA2749@acer>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 07:33:44 +0300
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@....fi>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hsweeten@...ionengravers.com,
ryan@...ewatersys.com, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
spi mailing list <spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] dmaengine: add ep93xx DMA support
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 10:47:14PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
>
> > IMHO it is better to have ep93xx implementation on its own driver since it is
> > not a real AMBA PL022 peripheral but some weird hack made by Cirrus (although
> > my opinions are bit biased).
>
> I disagree because it's IMO at first sight no more deviant than our "PL023"
> variants that still use the same pl022 driver.
Ok.
Do you think that we can go forward with this patch series if I drop the last
patch (spi/ep93xx: add DMA support)? This way we will have dmaengine
implementation in place, whatever SPI driver we choose to use with ep93xx.
We can then try to use amba-pl022 driver with ep93xx and see if it works or
not, and how much work is needed. I would like some comments from Hartley and
Ryan also.
> Is there some inexepensive hardware with EP93xx I can get to fix this
> myself?
Check for example Technologic Systems (embeddedarm.com), I have their TS-7260
board which has ep9302.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists