linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] block: Move non-rotational flag to queue limits

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110527130248.GA17219@redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 27 May 2011 09:02:49 -0400
From:	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
To:	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc:	jaxboe@...ionio.com, msb@...omium.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dm-devel@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] block: Move non-rotational flag to queue limits

On Thu, May 26 2011 at 10:42pm -0400,
Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@...cle.com> wrote:

> To avoid special-casing the non-rotational flag when stacking it is
> moved from the queue flags to be part of the queue limits. This allows
> us to handle it like the remaining I/O topology information.

blk_queue_nonrot vs blk_queue_non_rotational lends itself to a small
amount of confusion.

What about:
 s/blk_queue_nonrot/blk_queue_non_rotational/
 s/blk_queue_non_rotational/blk_queue_set_non_rotational/
?

Otherwise, looks great.

Acked-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/