linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 27 May 2011 10:47:00 -0400
From:	Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Linus <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree

On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 01:11, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (sparc32 defconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> drivers/misc/kgdbts.c: In function 'check_and_rewind_pc':
> drivers/misc/kgdbts.c:307: error: implicit declaration of function 'instruction_pointer_set'
>
> Caused by commit 63ab25ebbc50 ("kgdbts: unify/generalize gdb breakpoint
> adjustment") from Linus' tree.
>
> Lots of architectures do not use asm-generic/ptrace.h where
> instruction_pointer_set() is defined.

yes, but lots of arches dont implement kgdb, so it doesnt matter :).
i thought i got all of them, but i must have missed some, or new
arches showed up since i wrote the patches.  i'll take a look later
today and send out a fix.
-mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/