[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4DDFD622.1000102@caviumnetworks.com>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 09:49:38 -0700
From: David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>
To: David Gibson <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, grant.likely@...retlab.ca
CC: linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, ralf@...ux-mips.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 1/6] of: Allow scripts/dtc/libfdt to be used from
kernel code
On 05/26/2011 08:24 PM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 09:47:56AM -0700, David Daney wrote:
>> On 05/20/2011 11:33 PM, David Gibson wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 03:25:38PM -0700, David Daney wrote:
>>>> To use it you need to do this in your Kconfig:
>>>>
>>>> select LIBFDT
>>>>
>>>> And in the Makefile of the code using libfdt something like:
>>>>
>>>> ccflags-y := -include linux/libfdt_env.h -I$(src)/../../../scripts/dtc/libfdt
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: David Daney<ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/of/Kconfig | 3 +++
>>>> drivers/of/Makefile | 2 ++
>>>> drivers/of/libfdt/Makefile | 3 +++
>>>> drivers/of/libfdt/fdt.c | 2 ++
>>>> drivers/of/libfdt/fdt_ro.c | 2 ++
>>>> drivers/of/libfdt/fdt_wip.c | 2 ++
>>>
>>> No fdt_sw.c or fdt_rw.c?
>>>
>>
>> I had no immediate need for them. They could of course be added,
>> but that would potentially waste space.
>>
>> Let's see if I can make it into an archive library.
>
> That would be preferable. It's more or less designed to work that way
> so that everything is available without using unnecessary space in the
> binary.
>
Well, I was looking at this some more:
Grant specifically requested that this go in drivers/of/libfdt, however
I am fairly sure that building archive libraries there will require
changes to the upper level Makefile infrastructure.
If I go back to lib/libfdt, like my first version, I can easily achieve
archive library behavior, but then it is separated from from drivers/of.
Personally I am starting to like the lib/libfdt home more than
drivers/of. If Grant doesn't object, I think I will move it back there.
What do you think?
David Daney
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists