[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110528180848.GC12530@elte.hu>
Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 20:08:48 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
acme@...stprotocols.net, peterz@...radead.org, fweisbec@...il.com,
paulus@...ba.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf stat: clarify unsupported events from uncounted
events
* David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com> wrote:
> After:
>
> perf stat -ddd -- sleep 1
>
> Performance counter stats for 'sleep 1':
>
> 1.350326 task-clock # 0.001 CPUs utilized
> 2 context-switches # 0.001 M/sec
> 0 CPU-migrations # 0.000 M/sec
> 157 page-faults # 0.116 M/sec
> 11,986 cycles # 0.009 GHz
> <not supported> stalled-cycles-frontend
> <not supported> stalled-cycles-backend
> 496,986 instructions # 41.46 insns per cycle
> 138,065 branches # 102.246 M/sec
> 7,245 branch-misses # 5.25% of all branches [97.60%]
> <not counted> L1-dcache-loads
> <not counted> L1-dcache-load-misses
> <not counted> LLC-loads
> <not counted> LLC-load-misses
> <not counted> L1-icache-loads
> <not counted> L1-icache-load-misses
> <not counted> dTLB-loads
> <not counted> dTLB-load-misses
> <not counted> iTLB-loads
> <not counted> iTLB-load-misses
> <not counted> L1-dcache-prefetches
> <not supported> L1-dcache-prefetch-misses
That looks like a really useful distinction!
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists