[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110528074449.GB22382@infradead.org>
Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 03:44:49 -0400
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] blktrace: treat flush as barrier
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 11:09:41AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> AFAIK FLUSH always precedes WRITE and then followed by FUA, so how about
Right now most do because that's how the old barriers worked, but it's
going to change. For $NEXT + 1 I have a patch that for will make
xfs sends FUA without flushes in a lot of cases, and afaik some device
mapper code already does now.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists