[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1306627925.2029.341.camel@i7.infradead.org>
Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 01:12:02 +0100
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: Mike Travis <travis@....com>
Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Mike Habeck <habeck@....com>,
Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@....com>,
Derek Fults <dfults@....com>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>, stable@...nel.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Intel pci: Fix various problems with Intel IOMMU
code
On Sat, 2011-05-28 at 13:15 -0500, Mike Travis wrote:
> Various problems exist in the Intel IOMMU PCI driver when
> using DMA remapping in 1:1 identity mode on UV systems and
> devices cannot address all of physical memory.
>
> This patchset addresses those problems.
Patches 1-6 applied to iommu-2.6.git. Please test. Thanks.
Please note for future reference that 'From:' lines such as the one in
your patch 1/7 should be *first* in the body of your email. The git-am
tool doesn't find them and set the authorship if you put them with the
Signed-off-bys. Also please avoid putting whitespace at the beginning of
every line of your commit comments.
I still hate patch 7, but the point was that I wouldn't have to care
about it. Once your patches 1-6 are included in known stable releases
that your SCU can recognise, it can just pass 'iommu=pt' for those.
It's only the "probably buggy" kernels with older release numbers that
you'll pass 'forcedac,pt64' to, so your mission is to get patch 7 or
some variant of it accepted into *those* kernels.
--
dwmw2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists