[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110529215656.GA5576@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 22:56:56 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@...il.com>,
Samuel Ortiz <samuel@...tiz.org>
Subject: Re: IrDA driver fails on PXA255
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 02:17:02PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Sun, 29 May 2011, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
>
> > What about changing your patch for less intrusive one (to emit a
> > WARN_ON) for at least one
> > or two major releases and only then changing it back to the current state?
> >
>
> That would return memory that is not guaranteed to be within the first
> 16MB of address space, so a GFP_DMA allocation would succeed with memory
> not from ZONE_DMA.
Err, no. GFP_DMA returns memory in a zone which the platform has setup.
There's nothing specific about it being "16MB" or any other size; the
arch can chose what size that is.
> That's an invalid configuration, so users, including
> you, should at least edit their .config by hand to enable CONFIG_ZONE_DMA
> as a workaround.
Again, no. This change has caused a load of previously working drivers
to suddenly start failing without _any_ explanation why or even warning
about the change. It needs to start off as a WARN_ON() so that stuff
can be fixed, and then changed to a hard error.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists