[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110529124702.GE26627@elte.hu>
Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 14:47:02 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dan Rosenberg <drosenberg@...curity.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, davej@...hat.com,
kees.cook@...onical.com, davem@...emloft.net, eranian@...gle.com,
adobriyan@...il.com, penberg@...nel.org,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, pageexec@...email.hu
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Randomize kernel base address on boot
* H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> On 05/28/2011 05:18 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > Having half a megabyte of '__init buffer' at the beginning or end
> > of the kernel image is no big deal, it's more than enough for
> > good randomization and makes the whole thing image-loader
> > invariant: we can freely shift the 'real' kernel image within
> > this larger boundary without consulting RAM maps.
>
> Sure, but you're also blowing any attempt at PMD alignment to
> kingdom come.
Do you mean we'd not start at a 2MB boundary and thus would waste on
average an about 0.125 worth of huge-TLB cache entry?
That does not look like a very big issue to me - but maybe i'm
missing something and you mean something else.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists