linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build warningiIn Linus' tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110530073445.GA27557@elte.hu>
Date:	Mon, 30 May 2011 09:34:45 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Cc:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, stable@...nel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warningiIn Linus' tree


* Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org> wrote:

> From: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
> Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 23:38:15 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH] x86 idle: fix build warning for WARN_ONCE("idle=mwait")
> 
> In 5d4c47e0195b989f284907358bd5c268a44b91c7
> "x86 idle: deprecate mwait_idle() and "idle=mwait" cmdline param"...
> 
> I fat-fingered the editing when I updated the WARN_ONCE() string:
> 
> arch/x86/kernel/process.c: In function 'idle_setup':
> arch/x86/kernel/process.c:645:1: warning: unknown escape sequence: '\i'
> 
> remove the '\n' while we are here, it works fine without it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/process.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

Len, i'd *really* prefer it if patches changing arch/x86/ had a 
longer test time in linux-next than what you are gave it here.

This kind of 'send them to lkml and merge them into your linux-next 
branch and send it to Linus on the same day' kind of ambush you have 
done with the 'x86 idle' patches might be convenient to you, but it 
is inconvenient to pretty much anyone else - and it is absolutely 
unacceptable to us x86 maintainers ...

*Especially* as these patches were contentious when you last posted 
them as an RFC to lkml ...

So please watch out for this in the future, ok?

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/