[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110530101619.GC20052@erda.amd.com>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 12:16:19 +0200
From: Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"oprofile-list@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<oprofile-list@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] oprofile fixes for v2.6.40
On 30.05.11 06:09:56, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com> wrote:
>
> > > But i really do not see how this can work. get_eilvt() twiddles
> > > the APIC LVT of this current CPU. Does IBS only activate on a
> > > single CPU? How will this LVT entry be cleared on deinit?
> >
> > This is done on the current cpu to get the offset which is then
> > used on all cpus of the system. The actually per-core setup for ibs
> > is in op_amd_setup_ctrs(). Deinit is in op_amd_cpu_shutdown().
>
> The way IBS is set up is not very obvious and atypical of existing
> preempt_*() patters. Might be worth adding a comment to the
> preempt_disable(), to unconfuse unsuspecting readers who are
> wondering about its oddness?
Yes, will add some comments.
> Anyway, i suspected that it was correctly working code so i pulled it
> and pushed it to Linus, it should all be in 3.0-rc1.
Have seen it, thanks Ingo,
-Robert
--
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Operating System Research Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists