[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1105301255560.3164@localhost6.localdomain6>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 12:57:52 +0100 (BST)
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@....EDU>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix corruption of CONFIG_X86_32 in 'make oldconfig'
On Mon, 30 May 2011, Theodore Tso wrote:
> OK, so to clarify, what you want is for ARCH=xxx to always override
> whatever is in .config? Are we all on the same page here? I thought
> David was arguing that what was in .config should always be more
> important, since he regards "ARCH=xxxx" as "legacy".
I am saying that we should not have that redundancy at all. ATM we *only*
have it for CONFIG_64BIT and *only* on x86, not others like ppc/sh/sparc
etc.
--
dwmw2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists