linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] oprofile fixes for v2.6.40

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110530144409.GB13966@elte.hu>
Date:	Mon, 30 May 2011 16:44:09 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"oprofile-list@...ts.sourceforge.net" 
	<oprofile-list@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] oprofile fixes for v2.6.40


* Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com> wrote:

> On 30.05.11 12:16:19, Robert Richter wrote:
> > On 30.05.11 06:09:56, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > The way IBS is set up is not very obvious and atypical of existing 
> > > preempt_*() patters. Might be worth adding a comment to the 
> > > preempt_disable(), to unconfuse unsuspecting readers who are 
> > > wondering about its oddness?
> > 
> > Yes, will add some comments.
> 
> Ingo,
> 
> please see below and apply the patch to tip, if it makes sense to you.

Yeah, looks good to me - feel free to handle this via the regular 
oprofile flow of patches.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/