[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110530192344.GA5393@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 21:23:44 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: "Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"stable@...nel.org" <stable@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warningiIn Linus' tree
* Brown, Len <len.brown@...el.com> wrote:
> Alan convinced me that the community doesn't move that fast, and
> that we should wallow in the swill for a while longer before
> deleting. [...]
Yeah, it's much nicer this way.
> [...] Others volunteered to test the latest upstream kernel on APM
> hardware, giving APM's presence in the upstream kernel a life line.
> So all I did was add the recommended feature-removal's and warnings
> for the stuff which obviously should go. But if you see some of
> your favorite bits on the chopping block, you have at least 6
> months to make a case for them :-)
:-)
I only saw one of the runtime warnings on one of my testboxes - i
adjusted the boot parameter setting (the parameter was bogus) and
moved on. So life can go on as far as i'm involved :-)
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists