[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110530195545.GG2890@dhcp-172-31-194-241.cam.corp.google.com>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 15:55:45 -0400
From: Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix corruption of CONFIG_X86_32 in 'make oldconfig'
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 08:03:08PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
>
> And that the legacy trick of using ARCH=i386 or ARCH=x86_64 as a hack to
> override *just* CONFOG_64BIT, although nobody has posted a patch which
> removes or breaks that, probably ought to be deprecated in favour of a
> more generic way to override config options - one that doesn't work only
> for *one* config option, and only on *one* architecture.
So I could imagine two ways of doing this. One would be a new file,
.config-fixed, that contains a series of "CONFIG_XXX=[ymn]" which
would have to be satisfied and which override what
allyesconfig/allnoconfig/randconfig would otherwise do.
The other way would be some kind of new tagging in the .config file
itself, e.g.:
CONFIG_64BIT=y # FIXED
There are all sorts of interesting design questions hidden in here, of
course, including what if the fixedpoint declarations (whether done
via a separate file or via tags in .config) are mutually inconsistent.
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists