[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110530131052.8cc0c283.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 13:10:52 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Turning off the incremental diff robot
On Mon, 30 May 2011 15:45:00 -0400 Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 12:03:03PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > With the v3.0 name change I was looking over what might break, and I'm
> > seriously considering turning off the incremental diff robot on
> > kernel.org. It's not clear to me that it is actually useful anymore,
> > with git and all.
>
> What is the incremental diff robot?
>
> Does it make the patches between 2.6.x to 2.6.x+1?
>
> >
> > Do anyone actually use these anymore?
>
> If the above is the case, yes I do. And we need to update the ketchup
> script as well.
and scripts/patch-kernel needs to be fixed (or dropped).
It will use the incremental diffs, but I doubt that patch-kernel or the
incremental diffs model has many users (he said with no proof :).
They could go away IMO. I only use git or -rc or daily tarballs.
The only time that I have used incremental diffs was for a poor man's
bisect, but git does it much better.
---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists