[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4DE31A2E.70705@st.com>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 06:16:46 +0200
From: Giuseppe CAVALLARO <peppe.cavallaro@...com>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
Cc: Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@....de>,
user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2 small kernel config issues related to UML + RTC
Hi Valdis
On 5/29/2011 7:17 PM, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:
> On Sun, 29 May 2011 11:22:01 +0200, Toralf Förster said:
>> │ Symbol: STMMAC_RTC_TIMER [=n]
>> │ Type : boolean
>> │ Prompt: Real time clock
>> │ Defined at drivers/net/stmmac/Kconfig:50
>> │ Depends on: <choice> && RTC_CLASS
>> │ Location:
>> │ -> Network device support (NETDEVICES [=y])
>> │ -> Ethernet (1000 Mbit) (NETDEV_1000 [=n])
>> │ -> STMicroelectronics 10/100/1000 Ethernet driver (STMMAC_ETH [=n])
>> │ -> STMMAC Timer optimisation (STMMAC_TIMER [=n])
>> │ -> Select Timer device (<choice> [=n])
>
> Ouch. That has to be the strangest place one could *possibly* put an RTC driver. ;)
>
> Giuseppe - is that RTC driver *really* an integral part of the chipset and
> won't work without the Ethernet parts, or should the driver code for the RTC
> live elsewhere in the tree?
No the external RTC (or the SH-4 TMU) HW can be used by the driver to
handle the rx/tx process mitigating the DMA interrupts. This is not the
best approach but it actually helped many people to space the CPU
especially on old chips w/o dedicate timer.
It's likely I will remove all this code as soon as I work on a chip with
the embedded watchdog.
Regards
Giuseppe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists