[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1306832306.2816.3.camel@menhir>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 09:58:26 +0100
From: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>
To: Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>
Cc: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sunil.mushran@...cle.com
Subject: Re: Cleancache and shared filesystems
Hi,
On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 16:33 -0700, Joel Becker wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 05:19:39PM +0100, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
> > + if (ls->ls_ops == &gfs2_dlm_ops) {
> > + if (gfs2_uuid_valid(sb->s_uuid))
> > + cleancache_init_shared_fs(sb->s_uuid, sb);
> > + } else {
> > + cleancache_init_fs(sb);
> > + }
>
> Hey Dan,
> Steven makes a good point here. ocfs2 could also take advantage
> of local filesystem behavior when running in local mode.
>
> Joel
>
There is a further issue as well - cleancache will only work when all
nodes can see the same shared cache, so we will need a mount option to
disable cleancache in the case we have (for example) a cluster of
virtual machines split over multiple physical hosts.
In fact, I think from the principle of least surprise this had better
default to off and be enabled explicitly. Otherwise I can see that
people will shoot themselves in the foot which will be very easy since
there is no automatic way that I can see to verify that all nodes are
looking at the same cache,
Steve.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists