[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4DE4393E.1080703@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 18:41:34 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: Ashwin Chaugule <ashbertslists@...il.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: perf: h/w counters not counted and no error/info reported to
user
On 05/30/2011 03:04 PM, Ashwin Chaugule wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 12:36 PM, David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> Ok, I got it now. On some occasions for simple programs -- like sleep 1
>> -- the counter reads show:
>>
>> cycles: 0 1066485 0
>>
>> While the counter value is non-0, the time enabled and running values
>> are 0 and those latter two are used by stat to say "not-counted".
>
> I've seen time-enabled = 0 too, but I suspected that's because on my
> kernel the sched_clock implementation was missing. (defaults to a
> jiffies based timer)
I think in the case of 'perf stat -- sleep 1' it runs so quickly that
sometimes it does not cross timer ticks and the time_enabled comes out 0.
> I saw your patch for initializing the fd's to -1's, but I'm unable to
> see how that makes the value of time-enabled non zero ?
It doesn't. That patch addresses unsupported counters in the default
list (e.g., -ddd on a T9550 Core2Duo). The first open fails (cpu 0,
thread 0) and the entire FD array is not reset to -1 (from its
initialization to 0).
David
>
> Cheers,
> Ashwin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists