linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 09/10] x86-64: Randomize int 0xcc magic al values at boot

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110531164316.GB15651@elte.hu>
Date:	Tue, 31 May 2011 18:43:16 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Andrew Lutomirski <luto@....edu>
Cc:	x86@...nel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...ell.com>,
	richard -rw- weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>,
	Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/10] x86-64: Randomize int 0xcc magic al values at
 boot


* Andrew Lutomirski <luto@....edu> wrote:

> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Andrew Lutomirski <luto@....edu> wrote:
> > We could scrap int 0xcc entirely and emulate on page fault, but that
> > is slower and has other problems (like breaking anything that thinks
> > it can look at a call target in a binary and dereference that
> > address).
> >
> > Here's a possibly dumb/evil idea:
> >
> > Put real syscalls in the vsyscall page but mark the page NX.  Then
> > emulate the vsyscalls on the PF_INSTR fault when userspace jumps to
> > the correct address but send SIGSEGV for the wrong address.
> >
> > Down side: it's even more complexity for the same silly case.
> 
> Scratch that.  It's incompatible with keeping time() fast for now.

If we can find another fault than #PF then it will be similarly fast 
to an INT $0xCC so please at least investigate this route.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/