[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110531174430.GG2393@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 10:44:30 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] RCU fix
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 02:05:21AM +0900, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 1:27 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> >
> > Please pull the latest core-urgent-for-linus git tree from:
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip.git core-urgent-for-linus
>
> So remind me again why RCU switched to the stupid threads? It caused
> problems for rcutiny, it now causes silly problems for rcutree. Why do
> it? It's just extra complexity and no real advantage afaik.
The reason for the switch is to allow threads blocked in TREE_PREEMPT_RCU
and TINY_PREEMPT_RCU RCU read-side critical sections to have their
priority boosted in order to avoid OOM. People have made these OOMs
happen, so this is not longer just a theoretical concern.
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists